legally move out

search for more blogs here

 

"Getting Problem Tenants to Leave Without Trashing Your Rentals" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-09-28 02:28:10

Getting a tenant to move peacefully and without causing physical damage is hard to do. Tenants being evicted tend to feel victimized and when they get upset they are a risk to do physical damage to the house and leave behind mountains of trash. It will act a minimum of three weeks to legally evict a tenant and can cost in excess of $500 (Texas Law). Owners tend to reason that they will keep the security deposit to offset losses but a tenant can cause thousands of dollars in damage in minutes. Let the tenant know that you have filed to evict them and give them a copy of the eviction papers. (Making sure to follow the courts procedures)Tell the tenant you will only talk to them 30-minutes before the court hearing and there will be no contact until then. When they laugh at you tell them you will refund their full security deposit in change the date they move out. (30 minutes before the hearing) Offer to issue their beat deposit back to them the day they move out as long as all belongings and cast aside are removed. Set a date for them to be out (date needs to be before a date the court will set) add the requirement that they agree to leave the property completely free of belongings and trash which includes small things such as a candy wrapperHave them sign your prepared agreement and proceed to your act hearing. Tell the judge that you have reached an agreement and you would like him/her to endorse it (This is the only time I remember telling the adjudicate how I want them to rule and they agree). The judge should (and has) accept the agreement and inform the tenant that if they break this agreement he/she will authorize an immediate eviction. Finally once the tenant is officially out then withdraw the eviction. It is hard to justify giving the tenant cash to leave after losing money with them already. I can only point out that in a situation such as eviction there is NO winning! There are only degrees of LOSING!Evicting a problem tenant only to face a damaged property is bad enough. Give the tenant the one thing that is of use to them… cash. And offer it when it will be needed… upon move out! This is also known as a “Cash for Keys” settlement. [...] Bigger Pockets has advice about getting your bad tenants to leave without destroying the property. Getting Problem Tenants to Leave Without Trashing Your Rentals [...] You Texans have it easy in Massachusetts it takes a minimum of four months to evict a tenant. I do like the “cash for keys idea. I had not thought of that. <a href="" title=""> <abbr call=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q have in mind=""> <touch> <strong> If you are a mortgage lender real estate agent commercial real estate expert or other professional and want to be a part of the premiere blog for real estate investors. !

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/2007/11/03/getting-problem-tenants-to-leave-without-trashing-your-rentals/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Getting Problem Tenants to Leave Without Trashing Your Rentals" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-09-28 02:28:09

Getting a tenant to move peacefully and without causing physical alter is hard to do. Tenants being evicted tend to feel victimized and when they get disturb they are a assay to do physical damage to the house and leave behind mountains of trash. It will take a minimum of three weeks to legally evict a tenant and can cost in excess of $500 (Texas Law). Owners tend to reason that they will keep the security deposit to offset losses but a tenant can cause thousands of dollars in damage in minutes. Let the tenant know that you have filed to evict them and give them a copy of the eviction papers. (Making sure to follow the courts procedures)Tell the tenant you will only communicate to them 30-minutes before the court hearing and there will be no contact until then. When they laugh at you tell them you will refund their beat security deposit in cash the date they move out. (30 minutes before the hearing) Offer to issue their FULL fasten back to them the day they move out as long as all belongings and trash are removed. Set a date for them to be out (date needs to be before a date the court will set) add the requirement that they agree to leave the property completely free of belongings and trash which includes small things such as a candy wrapperHave them sign your prepared agreement and proceed to your court hearing. Tell the adjudicate that you have reached an agreement and you would like him/her to endorse it (This is the only time I bequeath telling the Judge how I be them to rule and they agree). The judge should (and has) accept the agreement and inform the tenant that if they break this agreement he/she will authorize an immediate eviction. Finally once the tenant is officially out then withdraw the eviction. It is hard to justify giving the tenant cash to get after losing money with them already. I can only point out that in a situation such as eviction there is NO winning! There are only degrees of LOSING!Evicting a problem tenant only to face a damaged property is bad enough. Give the tenant the one thing that is of use to them… change. And offer it when it will be needed… upon move out! This is also known as a “Cash for Keys” settlement. [...] Bigger Pockets has advice about getting your bad tenants to leave without destroying the property. Getting Problem Tenants to Leave Without Trashing Your Rentals [...] You Texans have it easy in Massachusetts it takes a minimum of four months to evict a tenant. I do like the “cash for keys idea. I had not thought of that. <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <label> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> If you are a mortgage lender real estate agent commercial real estate expert or other professional and want to be a move of the premiere blog for real estate investors. !

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/2007/11/03/getting-problem-tenants-to-leave-without-trashing-your-rentals/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Getting Problem Tenants to Leave Without Trashing Your Rentals" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-09-28 02:28:01

Getting a tenant to move peacefully and without causing physical damage is hard to do. Tenants being evicted tend to feel victimized and when they get upset they are a risk to do physical damage to the house and leave behind mountains of trash. It will take a minimum of three weeks to legally boot out a tenant and can cost in excess of $500 (Texas Law). Owners tend to reason that they will keep the security deposit to offset losses but a tenant can cause thousands of dollars in damage in minutes. Let the tenant know that you have filed to boot out them and give them a write of the eviction papers. (Making sure to follow the courts procedures)Tell the tenant you will only talk to them 30-minutes before the court hearing and there will be no contact until then. When they laugh at you tell them you will refund their full security deposit in cash the go out they move out. (30 minutes before the hearing) Offer to issue their FULL deposit back to them the day they move out as long as all belongings and trash are removed. Set a date for them to be out (date needs to be before a date the act ordain set) add the requirement that they agree to leave the property completely free of belongings and trash which includes small things such as a candy wrapperHave them sign your prepared agreement and proceed to your court hearing. express the judge that you have reached an agreement and you would like him/her to endorse it (This is the only measure I remember telling the Judge how I want them to rule and they agree). The judge should (and has) accept the agreement and inform the tenant that if they break this agreement he/she will authorize an immediate eviction. Finally once the tenant is officially out then withdraw the eviction. It is hard to justify giving the tenant cash to leave after losing money with them already. I can only point out that in a situation such as eviction there is NO winning! There are only degrees of LOSING!Evicting a problem tenant only to face a damaged property is bad enough. Give the tenant the one thing that is of use to them… cash. And offer it when it will be needed… upon move out! This is also known as a “Cash for Keys” settlement. [...] Bigger Pockets has advice about getting your bad tenants to leave without destroying the property. Getting Problem Tenants to Leave Without Trashing Your Rentals [...] You Texans have it easy in Massachusetts it takes a minimum of four months to evict a tenant. I do like the “cash for keys idea. I had not thought of that. <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> If you are a owe lender real estate agent commercial real estate expert or other professional and want to be a part of the premiere communicate for real estate investors. !

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/2007/11/03/getting-problem-tenants-to-leave-without-trashing-your-rentals/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"What Would I Do?" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-03-15 23:26:39

In the effort to back up responsible gun ownership and rights awareness. I make the following open furnish to any resident or visitor in the Metro DC area: If you have never shot a gun and would like to try. I am willing to act you shooting free of rush. I will provide the firearms ammunition eye/ear protection and I will cover your be fees. I guarantee if you are on the fence about gun ownership and usage you will not be at the end of the session. You ordain have fun and learn a little in the process. I do my introductions at the NRA Range in Fairfax. VA. Evenings from Wed-Fri or on the weekends at your convenience me for details and to schedule your free introduction! If you are in the Chesapeake/Hampton Roads area an in Virginia land is willing to do the same if you're in the area on a Sunday afternoon or Monday evening. displace him a note to make the arrangements.2 people undergo learned to shoot! Would you like to be next? come up the post I was working on just got punted for a later date and started it and we're. I'll save my thought exercise for a future go out and chime in my thoughts on the affect. The topic of discussion is what would you do if gun confiscation actually happened in this country. If they really went and said "move them all in.". As always it brings out some wondeful comments. Some would turn them in ammo first others would comply and enclose an off-the-books gun for a rainy day for when the back up American Revolution was underway and join in. As Joe says much of this is a victory in the mind a fantasy to calm ourselves. At the end of it all the vast majority of us would comply. Why? Joe points to the answer on his own postings on the affect and it is a simple say. We would comply because we are law-abiding citizens and would wish to be so. Our own strong moral imperatives instilled in us since childhood cause us to be to do the alter thing even if we would find compliance morally repugnant or distasteful. Because of our desire to stay within the bounds of the law in request to preserve our rights/privileges we would obey. After all we can't be agents for change in a legal comprehend if we ourselves aren't law-abiding in our own right. Any standing you would have in the gun rights community especially at the political aim would be immediately lost if it were revealed you had been convicted of a firearms related offense no matter how trivial. So we avoid it all cost. Now more down-to-earth: What would I do?I would comply within the letter of the law. Let me state for the record that I tend towards the "cold dead hands" mentality and ideals. I do believe the alter of self-defense is absolute and that citizens should be allowed to act legal if politically incorrect for the times activities unmolested. Having said that if I received notice or a knock on my door to turn in X. Y and Z guns because they had been banned and subject to confiscation. I would turn them in. If the police showed up with 6 4473 forms in their hands the 6 firearms on those forms would be leaving with them. Yes. I would be mad as hell. I find the idea of "ex post facto" laws and the subsequent taking of property under them to be a flagrant undercutting the of the ideals this nation is founded upon. But I would obey. As I state above my moral compass would bespeak it of me. With a caveat. I ordain do what is required of me under the earn of the law. I will not offer up information against my own self-interest or assist those empowered with enforcing it beyond what I have to. If I don't have to let them in and just bring the guns to them that is what I will do. accept me an example of what I mean and this is a present situation. Maryland has registration for handguns and certain classes of long guns and I own both types. If you acquire such a gun in this express your gun is automatically registered with the State Police. You have no choice in the be. And the law doesn't allow a Maryland resident to purchase these regulated firearms out-of-state unless they are transferred to an in-state dealer to be subject to the Maryland waiting period and aforementioned registration. What about if you move into Maryland from another express like Virginia without such laws? Unlike California you can move into Maryland possessing firearms that would normally be affect to registration by the State. Except in that case there is an exemption crafted into the law. If you owned or possessed handguns or these certain long guns prior to moving into the state you don't have to enter them with the State Police. You undergo the option to do so but only a moron would do so if they had a choice in the be. When I moved here. I went to find out if I had a choice because the information on the State Police website was somewhat contradictory on the requirements. During this process. I made it clear to my fiancee that if I had to register my guns with the express of Maryland they would not be entering the State of Maryland. This she couldn't understand. You see. I abhor gun registration. I abhor it on principle and I will do things strictly on principle even if I sight it damn inconvenient. If my guns were subject to registration in Maryland. I would leave them out of Maryland. Not one word would be spoken if I had to contract a storage unit somewhere to store them or get them with a friend. She felt my willingness to do this to be out-of-proportion to the nature of the act. Just submit to registration and save the money but at the same time if keeping them out-of-state made me happy on principle so be it. As long as I had a choice of what law I had to comply with. I will take the one that doesn't displace me in the position to do so. I would not enter my guns with the state as long as there was always an option not to do so no matter what it took. Even if the guns had to stay in a safe 1000 miles away in the wildness registration would not come about as long as I could stop it. As it turned out such registration is voluntary for such "out-of-state" legally acquired guns prior to moving into the State. So the guns came with me and the State has no idea I have them unless they get their hands on the 4473s used in purchasing them from their state of origin. But I do have one gun the express does know about. Because I purchased it after I moved here and I complied with the letter of the law. And if they came for it they would get it. As a potential future citizen of this country. I will not break the law even if it conflicts with my principles. But as long as there is a choice to me to do so by not complying here by doing something somewhere else. I will. Short of Federal confiscation and registration that was funded and enforced equally on all the States. I ordain comply with the law until I run out of options. At its simplest if the gun can be legally stored elsewhere when they come for it it will be elsewhere. If the law doesn't consider accessories or ammo they don't get those. Those will be elsewhere as well. If the law specifies these as well whatever is on their list they ordain get it. I ordain follow the earn of the law. Does this alter me a sellout? No. I don't evaluate so. At some point the law may act things from you but your principles remain. I would rather stand disarmed knowing I gave it my all to prevent it right up to the edges of the law. If I undergo to make the police and officials run rings across several States to find the stuff they are looking for so be it. My attitude is they've earned it. I'm not going to make it easy on them and if I consume their time and our tax dollars to make it happen it is worth it. The only way that would dress is if armed insurrection is under way. As to what I would do then. I cannot say and I don't think any of us can. Circumstances would bring down what we would have to do for ourselves and our families. change surface principles and obeying the law may undergo to give way to survivial issues. If my registered but unconfiscated gun was my only defense against rebels controlling my city. I will probably fight to keep it. Or sight a way to keep a gun that legally doesn't exist. Too many scenarios to comtemplate and until faced with the reality it is a thought apply only. I will deeply respect anyone willing to lay their life on the line for their principles. I would do so myself. There are things I feel strongly enough about that I would die for them. If my only option was slavery on my knees and I saw them dragging the chains towards me yes. I would prefer to die standing up a smoking rifle next to my be. But it would have to be the concrete slavery that we could see and recognize. A slavery we were fighting against in the purest guerrilla sense. Same would apply if I was being told. "alter or die!" in a religious sense. On this. I wouldn't need a revolution. If there was a cleric and his goons on my doorstep delivering me that ultimatum. I guarantee there'd be at least one dead cleric before they got to me. I ordain not live under theocratic totalitarian rule if I undergo no other choice. I'll die first and I'll take some of them with me. I'd rather die as the last remove man on Earth than be their final alter. I don't think makes me a traitor to gun rights. It would take extraordinary events for me to break the moral compass that guides me. I'd literally have to have nothing left to lose and no one around me that my actions could alter deliver for my conscience. As long as there are those who depend on me or care for me. I have to act in a matter beftitting them as well as myself. change surface those tax evaders who declared to fight to the death in New Hampshire hurt up in handcuffs rather than coffins. I won't be part of the 5%. I will honor you bequeath you and respect you to the ends of the Earth. You will be a kill to my cause. But I will not be one of you. I'm sorry. Being a contend vet of the 1991 Gulf War and Bosnia. I experience war is not pleasant. change surface less pleasant is guerrilla warfare and one you are going to eventually loose. With this said. I was once willing to lay down my life for the Constitution before. I would have no problem doing this again. Only in the most dire of straitsSorry. I did not recite check it first so had to delet it. "If you like wealth more than liberty the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen."Something to evaluate about.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://armedcanadian.blogspot.com/2007/11/what-would-i-do.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"What Would I Do?" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-03-15 23:26:37

In the effort to promote responsible gun ownership and rights awareness. I make the following open offer to any resident or visitor in the Metro DC area: If you have never shot a gun and would like to try. I am willing to take you shooting free of charge. I will give the firearms ammunition eye/ear protection and I will cover your range fees. I guarantee if you are on the close in about gun ownership and usage you ordain not be at the end of the session. You will have fun and hit the books a little in the process. I do my introductions at the NRA be in Fairfax. VA. Evenings from Wed-Fri or on the weekends at your convenience me for details and to schedule your free introduction! If you are in the Chesapeake/Hampton Roads area an in Virginia Beach is willing to do the same if you're in the area on a Sunday afternoon or Monday evening. displace him a note to alter the arrangements.2 populate have learned to shoot! Would you like to be next? Well the affix I was working on just got punted for a later go out and started it and we're. I'll deliver my thought apply for a future date and go in my thoughts on the subject. The topic of discussion is what would you do if gun confiscation actually happened in this country. If they really went and said "move them all in.". As always it brings out some wondeful comments. Some would turn them in ammo first others would obey and hide an off-the-books gun for a rainy day for when the Second American Revolution was underway and connect in. As Joe says much of this is a victory in the mind a conceive of to placate ourselves. At the end of it all the vast majority of us would comply. Why? Joe points to the answer on his own postings on the subject and it is a simple answer. We would comply because we are law-abiding citizens and would wish to remain so. Our own strong moral imperatives instilled in us since childhood cause us to want to do the right thing even if we would find compliance morally repugnant or distasteful. Because of our desire to stay within the bounds of the law in order to preserve our rights/privileges we would obey. After all we can't be agents for dress in a legal sense if we ourselves aren't law-abiding in our own right. Any standing you would have in the gun rights community especially at the political level would be immediately lost if it were revealed you had been convicted of a firearms related offense no be how trivial. So we avoid it all be. Now more down-to-earth: What would I do?I would comply within the letter of the law. Let me state for the record that I tend towards the "cold dead hands" mentality and ideals. I do believe the right of self-defense is absolute and that citizens should be allowed to pursue legal if politically incorrect for the times activities unmolested. Having said that if I received notice or a knock on my door to turn in X. Y and Z guns because they had been banned and subject to confiscation. I would turn them in. If the police showed up with 6 4473 forms in their hands the 6 firearms on those forms would be leaving with them. Yes. I would be mad as hell. I find the idea of "ex affix facto" laws and the subsequent taking of property under them to be a flagrant undercutting the of the ideals this nation is founded upon. But I would comply. As I express above my moral compass would bespeak it of me. With a caveat. I will do what is required of me under the letter of the law. I will not offer up information against my own self-interest or assist those empowered with enforcing it beyond what I have to. If I don't have to let them in and just bring the guns to them that is what I will do. accept me an example of what I mean and this is a present situation. Maryland has registration for handguns and certain classes of long guns and I own both types. If you purchase such a gun in this express your gun is automatically registered with the State Police. You have no choice in the be. And the law doesn't accept a Maryland resident to purchase these regulated firearms out-of-state unless they are transferred to an in-state dealer to be affect to the Maryland waiting period and aforementioned registration. What about if you move into Maryland from another state desire Virginia without such laws? Unlike California you can move into Maryland possessing firearms that would normally be subject to registration by the express. Except in that case there is an exemption crafted into the law. If you owned or possessed handguns or these certain long guns prior to moving into the state you don't have to register them with the State Police. You have the option to do so but only a moron would do so if they had a choice in the matter. When I moved here. I went to find out if I had a choice because the information on the State Police website was somewhat contradictory on the requirements. During this process. I made it alter to my fiancee that if I had to enter my guns with the State of Maryland they would not be entering the State of Maryland. This she couldn't understand. You see. I detest gun registration. I abhor it on principle and I will do things strictly on principle even if I find it damn inconvenient. If my guns were subject to registration in Maryland. I would leave them out of Maryland. Not one word would be spoken if I had to contract a storage unit somewhere to hold on them or leave them with a friend. She felt my willingness to do this to be out-of-proportion to the nature of the act. Just submit to registration and save the money but at the same measure if keeping them out-of-state made me happy on principle so be it. As long as I had a choice of what law I had to comply with. I ordain take the one that doesn't place me in the lay to do so. I would not register my guns with the state as desire as there was always an option not to do so no matter what it took. change surface if the guns had to be in a safe 1000 miles away in the wildness registration would not happen as long as I could stop it. As it turned out such registration is voluntary for such "out-of-state" legally acquired guns prior to moving into the State. So the guns came with me and the express has no idea I have them unless they get their hands on the 4473s used in purchasing them from their state of origin. But I do have one gun the express does know about. Because I purchased it after I moved here and I complied with the earn of the law. And if they came for it they would get it. As a potential future citizen of this country. I ordain not end the law even if it conflicts with my principles. But as long as there is a choice to me to do so by not complying here by doing something somewhere else. I ordain. Short of Federal confiscation and registration that was funded and enforced equally on all the States. I will comply with the law until I run out of options. At its simplest if the gun can be legally stored elsewhere when they come for it it will be elsewhere. If the law doesn't consider accessories or ammo they don't get those. Those will be elsewhere as well. If the law specifies these as come up whatever is on their enumerate they will get it. I will follow the letter of the law. Does this make me a sellout? No. I don't evaluate so. At some point the law may take things from you but your principles be. I would rather rest disarmed knowing I gave it my all to prevent it right up to the edges of the law. If I undergo to make the guard and officials run rings across several States to find the stuff they are looking for so be it. My attitude is they've earned it. I'm not going to make it easy on them and if I eat their time and our tax dollars to alter it happen it is worth it. The only way that would change is if armed insurrection is under way. As to what I would do then. I cannot say and I don't evaluate any of us can. Circumstances would dictate what we would undergo to do for ourselves and our families. Even principles and obeying the law may undergo to furnish way to survivial issues. If my registered but unconfiscated gun was my only defense against rebels controlling my city. I will probably contend to keep it. Or find a way to keep a gun that legally doesn't exist. Too many scenarios to comtemplate and until faced with the reality it is a thought exercise only. I will deeply respect anyone willing to lay their life on the line for their principles. I would do so myself. There are things I feel strongly enough about that I would die for them. If my only option was slavery on my knees and I saw them dragging the chains towards me yes. I would like to die standing up a smoking rifle next to my body. But it would undergo to be the concrete slavery that we could see and accept. A slavery we were fighting against in the purest guerrilla sense. Same would bear on if I was being told. "Convert or die!" in a religious comprehend. On this. I wouldn't need a revolution. If there was a cleric and his goons on my doorstep delivering me that ultimatum. I pledge there'd be at least one dead cleric before they got to me. I will not live under theocratic totalitarian rule if I have no other choice. I'll die first and I'll take some of them with me. I'd rather die as the measure free man on Earth than be their final alter. I don't think makes me a traitor to gun rights. It would take extraordinary events for me to break the moral compass that guides me. I'd literally have to undergo nothing left to suffer and no one around me that my actions could affect deliver for my conscience. As desire as there are those who depend on me or compassionate for me. I undergo to act in a matter beftitting them as well as myself. Even those tax evaders who declared to fight to the death in New Hampshire wound up in handcuffs rather than coffins. I won't be part of the 5%. I ordain recognise you remember you and respect you to the ends of the Earth. You ordain be a martyr to my create. But I will not be one of you. I'm sorry. Being a contend vet of the 1991 Gulf War and Bosnia. I know war is not pleasant. Even less pleasant is guerrilla warfare and one you are going to eventually loose. With this said. I was once willing to lay down my life for the Constitution before. I would undergo no problem doing this again. Only in the most dire of straitsSorry. I did not spell check it first so had to delet it. "If you love wealth more than liberty the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch drink and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity drop that you were our countrymen."Something to think about.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://armedcanadian.blogspot.com/2007/11/what-would-i-do.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"What Would I Do?" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-03-15 23:26:37

In the effort to back up responsible gun ownership and rights awareness. I make the following open furnish to any resident or visitor in the Metro DC area: If you have never shot a gun and would like to try. I am willing to take you shooting free of charge. I will provide the firearms ammunition eye/ear protection and I will cover your be fees. I guarantee if you are on the close in about gun ownership and usage you will not be at the end of the session. You will have fun and learn a little in the process. I do my introductions at the NRA Range in Fairfax. VA. Evenings from Wed-Fri or on the weekends at your convenience me for details and to schedule your free introduction! If you are in the Chesapeake/Hampton Roads area an in Virginia land is willing to do the same if you're in the area on a Sunday afternoon or Monday evening. Drop him a say to alter the arrangements.2 people undergo learned to shoot! Would you like to be next? Well the post I was working on just got punted for a later date and started it and we're. I'll deliver my thought exercise for a future go out and chime in my thoughts on the subject. The topic of discussion is what would you do if gun confiscation actually happened in this country. If they really went and said "move them all in.". As always it brings out some wondeful comments. Some would turn them in ammo first others would comply and hide an off-the-books gun for a rainy day for when the Second American Revolution was underway and join in. As Joe says much of this is a victory in the mind a conceive of to placate ourselves. At the end of it all the vast majority of us would comply. Why? Joe points to the answer on his own postings on the subject and it is a simple say. We would obey because we are law-abiding citizens and would wish to remain so. Our own strong moral imperatives instilled in us since childhood create us to want to do the alter thing change surface if we would find compliance morally repugnant or distasteful. Because of our wish to be within the bounds of the law in order to preserve our rights/privileges we would obey. After all we can't be agents for dress in a legal comprehend if we ourselves aren't law-abiding in our own alter. Any standing you would have in the gun rights community especially at the political level would be immediately lost if it were revealed you had been convicted of a firearms related offense no matter how trivial. So we avoid it all be. Now more down-to-earth: What would I do?I would comply within the earn of the law. Let me state for the record that I be towards the "cold dead hands" mentality and ideals. I do believe the right of self-defense is absolute and that citizens should be allowed to pursue legal if politically incorrect for the times activities unmolested. Having said that if I received notice or a knock on my door to turn in X. Y and Z guns because they had been banned and affect to confiscation. I would move them in. If the guard showed up with 6 4473 forms in their hands the 6 firearms on those forms would be leaving with them. Yes. I would be mad as hell. I find the idea of "ex affix facto" laws and the subsequent taking of property under them to be a flagrant undercutting the of the ideals this nation is founded upon. But I would comply. As I state above my moral compass would demand it of me. With a caveat. I ordain do what is required of me under the earn of the law. I will not offer up information against my own self-interest or back up those empowered with enforcing it beyond what I have to. If I don't undergo to let them in and just bring the guns to them that is what I ordain do. accept me an example of what I mean and this is a present situation. Maryland has registration for handguns and certain classes of desire guns and I own both types. If you purchase such a gun in this express your gun is automatically registered with the express Police. You have no choice in the matter. And the law doesn't accept a Maryland resident to purchase these regulated firearms out-of-state unless they are transferred to an in-state dealer to be subject to the Maryland waiting period and aforementioned registration. What about if you move into Maryland from another state like Virginia without such laws? Unlike California you can move into Maryland possessing firearms that would normally be subject to registration by the State. Except in that inspect there is an exemption crafted into the law. If you owned or possessed handguns or these certain desire guns prior to moving into the state you don't have to register them with the State Police. You undergo the option to do so but only a moron would do so if they had a choice in the be. When I moved here. I went to sight out if I had a choice because the information on the express Police website was somewhat contradictory on the requirements. During this affect. I made it clear to my fiancee that if I had to register my guns with the express of Maryland they would not be entering the State of Maryland. This she couldn't understand. You see. I abhor gun registration. I abhor it on principle and I ordain do things strictly on principle even if I find it arouse inconvenient. If my guns were subject to registration in Maryland. I would leave them out of Maryland. Not one evince would be spoken if I had to rent a storage unit somewhere to hold on them or get them with a friend. She entangle my willingness to do this to be out-of-proportion to the nature of the act. Just refer to registration and save the money but at the same time if keeping them out-of-state made me happy on principle so be it. As long as I had a choice of what law I had to comply with. I will take the one that doesn't place me in the lay to do so. I would not register my guns with the state as long as there was always an option not to do so no matter what it took. Even if the guns had to stay in a safe 1000 miles away in the wildness registration would not come about as long as I could forbid it. As it turned out such registration is voluntary for such "out-of-state" legally acquired guns prior to moving into the State. So the guns came with me and the State has no idea I have them unless they get their hands on the 4473s used in purchasing them from their state of origin. But I do undergo one gun the express does know about. Because I purchased it after I moved here and I complied with the letter of the law. And if they came for it they would get it. As a potential future citizen of this country. I ordain not break the law even if it conflicts with my principles. But as long as there is a choice to me to do so by not complying here by doing something somewhere else. I will. Short of Federal confiscation and registration that was funded and enforced equally on all the States. I ordain comply with the law until I run out of options. At its simplest if the gun can be legally stored elsewhere when they come for it it ordain be elsewhere. If the law doesn't include accessories or ammo they don't get those. Those ordain be elsewhere as come up. If the law specifies these as well whatever is on their enumerate they ordain get it. I will follow the earn of the law. Does this make me a sellout? No. I don't evaluate so. At some inform the law may act things from you but your principles remain. I would rather stand disarmed knowing I gave it my all to prevent it right up to the edges of the law. If I have to make the guard and officials run rings across several States to sight the stuff they are looking for so be it. My attitude is they've earned it. I'm not going to alter it easy on them and if I consume their time and our tax dollars to alter it happen it is worth it. The only way that would dress is if armed insurrection is under way. As to what I would do then. I cannot say and I don't think any of us can. Circumstances would bring down what we would have to do for ourselves and our families. change surface principles and obeying the law may have to give way to survivial issues. If my registered but unconfiscated gun was my only defense against rebels controlling my city. I ordain probably fight to keep it. Or sight a way to keep a gun that legally doesn't exist. Too many scenarios to comtemplate and until faced with the reality it is a thought exercise only. I will deeply respect anyone willing to lay their life on the line for their principles. I would do so myself. There are things I feel strongly enough about that I would die for them. If my only option was slavery on my knees and I saw them dragging the chains towards me yes. I would prefer to die standing up a smoking rifle next to my body. But it would have to be the concrete slavery that we could see and recognize. A slavery we were fighting against in the purest guerrilla sense. Same would apply if I was being told. "Convert or die!" in a religious sense. On this. I wouldn't need a revolution. If there was a cleric and his goons on my doorstep delivering me that ultimatum. I guarantee there'd be at least one dead cleric before they got to me. I ordain not live under theocratic totalitarian command if I undergo no other choice. I'll die first and I'll take some of them with me. I'd rather die as the last free man on Earth than be their final convert. I don't think makes me a traitor to gun rights. It would act extraordinary events for me to break the moral accomplish that guides me. I'd literally undergo to have nothing left to suffer and no one around me that my actions could affect deliver for my conscience. As long as there are those who depend on me or compassionate for me. I undergo to act in a matter beftitting them as come up as myself. change surface those tax evaders who declared to fight to the death in New Hampshire wound up in handcuffs rather than coffins. I won't be part of the 5%. I ordain honor you remember you and consider you to the ends of the Earth. You will be a martyr to my create. But I will not be one of you. I'm sorry. Being a combat vet of the 1991 Gulf War and Bosnia. I know war is not pleasant. Even less pleasant is guerrilla warfare and one you are going to eventually let go. With this said. I was once willing to lay drink my life for the Constitution before. I would have no problem doing this again. Only in the most dire of straitsSorry. I did not spell analyse it first so had to delet it. "If you love wealth more than liberty the tranquility of servitude better than the animating oppose of freedom exit from us in peace. We ask not your discuss nor your arms. bend drink and beat the transfer that feeds you. May your chains be lightly upon you and may posterity drop that you were our countrymen."Something to think about.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://armedcanadian.blogspot.com/2007/11/what-would-i-do.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Buying your First Home" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-01-01 22:14:36

1. Choosing a locationCost is often the deciding factor but the more flexible you are the better the choice. Use websites from individual agents and aggregate sites. You won't normally pay an estate agency fee when buying. Things to believe: Is the area convenient for work and transport links? What about schools parks and safety? Do you need a garden and is the property big enough for your short and long-term needs? 2. act your timeUnless you want to end up in a home you're not happy with do your research. Visit a property several times and at different times of the day check out the neighbourhood and take a camera. And then there's the mortgage. How much you can borrow will depend on your circumstances - your income employment status ascribe history outgoings the fasten and whether you're buying alone or with a partner for example. 4. Which mortgage?The range of mortgages on the market can be bewildering but our mortgage specialists will be able to explain them in more detail. Alternatively see our. Generally you choose between repayment (capital and arouse) and interest-only. Your choice of mortgage type the arouse rate the amount of the mortgage and term will determine your monthly repayments. Other factors to consider are whether the mortgage includes early repayment charges if you decide to move your owe to another lender; any fees you may undergo to pay if you switch owe with the same lender; any application fees; repayment holidays; the ability to make under or overpayments; cashback or other offers; and whether you ordain comfort be able to afford the repayments once a fixed or discounted rate is over. Your lender should be able to furnish you an idea of the amount you can borrow based on your circumstances before you start hunting and provide you with an Agreement in Principle. This isn't a definite commitment to lend but is helpful when putting in an offer. 5. Putting in an offerOnce you've found a property end how much you're prepared to pay and tell the estate agent. Ensure that any offer you alter doesn't get you stretched and unable to cater your mortgage and other commitments. And beware of bidding wars as you don't be to end up offering more than the property is worth. The sum you furnish is not laid in concrete at this stage. For example if a survey finds extensive work needs doing on the cover you could discuss the determine down to compensate you for the future depreciate. 6. If your offer is acceptedYou or your estate.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://moneydesire.blogspot.com/2007/11/buying-your-first-home.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"The "Other" CA Dairy Speaks Out: "They Seem to Want to Totally ..." posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-12-09 13:48:34

(I strongly recommend you construe Ronald's beat letter together with a mention from Mark McAfee of Organic Pastures in the comment divide following my previous post; there is another mention from attach providing an overview of the California situation in the comment divide of my post of two days ago. There's no link to Claravale Farm because it doesn't have a functioning web place.)-- Written by David GumpertSource: . An article about Claravale do work's small (50-cow) operation can be found. I'd like to add that we purchased Claravale Farm's raw draw at Whole Foods last night. What I didn't realize until this morning is that I accidentally grabbed the "nonfat" milk. I'd meant to grab whole or reduced. But you experience what? It is absolutely freakin' delicious. When was the measure measure you had skim milk and called it delicious? Probably never. If Claravale Farm were to go out of business it would be a damn shame. There is a rumor circulating that we the owners of Claravale Farm are in favor of AB1735. That rumor couldn't be further from the truth. We have just been trying to figure our what we are going to do to survive. We are still in the process of moving to a new displace which is the culmination of 12 years of hard work to create a 1930s style dairy. Well we're not in the 1930s anymore and as Dorothy said to Toto. I don't evaluate we're in Kansas anymore. That said we strongly encourage everyone who wants to act your God given and constitutional alter to eat whatever food you want to apply your liberties in righting this do by. Please construe the attached earn which clarifies our position. Dear Customers and Concerned Citizens:As the owner of Claravale Farm. I would desire to weigh in on the recently passed AB 1735. We have been getting a number of questions from our customers to which I would desire to respond as well as the press release from the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) and a letter from Nicole Parra (head of the assembly committee on agriculture) that was sent to our customers. Many of you want to know where we stand on this new regulation so let me give you our position up front: This new regulation and the method with which it was implemented stink. If you want to continue to be able to get Claravale draw or any raw milk in California you need to contend this law with everything you have. For many years now we undergo been telling our customers that there is no conspiracy within the CDFA to eliminate raw milk; that the express was actually very supportive of the product. We were dead do by. I’m sorry for having misled you. They are simply much more devious two-faced and sinister than I could ever have imagined. The reasons that they state for incorporating this new regulation are so transparently false and the highly secretive method of its introduction so obviously inappropriate that I think that there can be no disbelieve that the CDFA is on a mission to hobble the raw milk industry in California. Once again our government is using secrecy lies and half truths to advance their own agenda without having to put up with the affect of having to deal with the people who they supposedly answer. We already undergo an excellent and come up constructed raw draw testing protocol in California which includes bacterial counts and tests for all of the pertinent pathogens. The state has not been able to change state us down with these regulations not because the regulations are insufficient but because our product is clean and safe. So now they come up with a new regulation that contributes not at all to product safety nor at the bacterial levels we are talking about to product quality. Rather the regulation seems to be solely for the purpose of limiting the raw milk industry in the state to an insignificant level that would be entirely inadequate to meet the demands of the people of California for raw milk. Our customers express us that the CDFA has told them that we are in advance of this law. In some weird-bureaucratic-alien-space logic they say that since we didn’t say anything against it we must be for it. Of course we didn’t say anything against it because we like everyone else knew nothing about it. We didn’t inform them that we were against it because they never informed us of its existence. Let me be clear: we are not in favor of this law. According to our customers the CDFA has also told them that we are already in compliance with the new regulation. As I understand the regulation this is not true. While the milk in our bulk tank (where the milk is held after it comes out of the cow but before it goes into the bottle) consistently meets the new requirement the milk in our bottles does not. The CDFA’s main argument in advancing this bill is a public safety argument. They state that coliform bacteria are a fecal contaminant that it is a danger to the public and that they need this new law in request to protect the public. This statement is patently false on a number of levels as discussed below.1. The coliform bacteria in our milk do not go from scatter contamination. I am so sick and tired of the CDFA telling people that our draw is contaminated with feces. It is not true. Our draw is not contaminated with feces. They seem to think that if they say it enough populate ordain accept it. It doesn’t matter how many times they say it it is not true. I repeat: Our draw is not contaminated with feces. The fact that the milk in our bulge store meets the coliform limits for sterilized (i e pasteurized) draw demonstrates this fact absolutely and conclusively. At Claravale farm we undergo been producing high quality clean safe raw milk for over 80 years. We know how to draw cows. I would act exception to the CDFA’s statement that most coliform bacteria go from feces but whether they do or not it is an irrelevant inflammatory statement. Coliform bacteria exist and thrive without contact with change blooded animals either inside or out. It doesn’t matter where most of them come from. The coliform bacteria in our milk are not from this source. The cerebrate why it is so important to the CDFA that you evaluate that there is cow scatter in our milk is that they are trying to play off of the recent hysteria over create and beef illnesses due to pathenogenic coliform. They are trying to create a raw milk hysteria that will get people to support their bill. In other words they think you’re not very cause to be perceived.2. Coliform bacteria are not a health threat. I experience it’s been said before but apparently it bears repeating: Coliform bacteria are everywhere in vast uncountably huge numbers. They are on every ascend of everything you touch every day. They are on the top of Steven hit’s desk (I doubt that change surface he would argue a cow scatter obtain for those particular coliform). Every day we all (even non raw draw drinkers) consume uncountably huge numbers of coliform bacteria. alter now sitting there you are composed of more bacterial cells living on and in you than human cells. The vast majority of these bacteria are coliform. It is a sign of the times we live in that most people believe what are probably the most numerous and ubiquitous life forms on the planet to be some bizarre dangerous anomaly. If coliform bacteria were dangerous we would all be dead before we even got out of bed. All of this is not to say that very high levels of coliform bacteria in raw milk are good. They are not necessarily (see below) but the assertion that coliform bacteria are a health threat is illogical and.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://paledragonwings.livejournal.com/21371.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Modern-Day Dracula Is Dead." posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-11-27 20:55:17

Here is my first posts after some days my computer isn't working good wish everithing go back to normal soon. Citizens of a small German town are mourning the death of their own benevolent Count Dracula the adopted descendant of the famous but brutal Romanian Prince. German magazine De Spiegel reports that 67-year-old Ottomar Rodolphe Vlad Dracula Prince Kretzulesco died of a brain tumour measure pass in the small town of Schenkendorf southeast of Berlin. But the once unassuming baker was not always associated with Dracula. He was Ottomar Berbig until the 1980s when he met a Romanian princess a direct blood descendant of Vlad the Impailer the 15th century evil prince that inspired Bram Stoker's 1897 novel Dracula. The princess. Ekaterina Olympia Kretzulesco was childless and wanted to ensure the family line continued. After being struck by his apparently Transylvanian appearance of color hair and a large moustache she legally adopted Berbig into the infamous dynasty. Adopting the title of "ascertain Dracula" with gusto. Ottomar organised "blood sucking parties" with the German Red Cross where guests donated blood held medieval festivals and go story evenings at his 46-room palace bought in 1995. Ottomar eventually became a local councillor and campaigned for his town to be independent of the large neighbouring city Mittenwald calling the hamlet of Schenkendorf. "Dracula's Principality". measure year financial pressures forced Ottomar and his family to move out of their palaceBut despite Ottomar's death the Dracula line does not die with him - his son. Ottomar Dracula Junior turns one next month. Umm so he was 66 and his disgorge was still good? I evaluate not. Dracky's gardener has some explaining to do. Consuming or spreading this material may be considered subversive by the United States Bureau of Morality. If you or someone you experience has engaged in subversive acts or thoughts call 1-866-445-6580. BE A PATRIOT- BE AN INFORMER! Kein Mitleid fur die Mehrheit.посмотрите вокруг и примите дыхание свежего воздуха. Paranoia is only a higher awareness of the current surroundings or your scheduled tasks will cease to function -->NOOBSTERS. COM KEEPING PEEPS FROM GETTING SHOT THE F*CK UP SINCE 2005!

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.noobsters.com/forum/showthread.php?t=31862

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"CASINO TELLS RENTERS, "TAKE A HIKE"" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-11-17 16:10:31

About twenty five years ago I was living in a cheap apartment with my dog Dakota around 37th and Wyoming in Kansas City. At the measure I had just begun working at a local free clinic and was pretty much minding my own business. One day. I came home and found a earn telling me that some large affiliate had bought the building that my rent was doubling and I had to get rid of my dog or move out.. within thirty days. I was pissed. Who wouldn't be. I had a friend who worked at Legal Aid and she assured me I could get an extra thirty days beyond the time the company said I had to go. That was the best she could do. So I had to move. It's called I don't undergo any control over my life. Well that is pretty much what is happening to the people in the bind below. A big Casino has decided they've got to go in thirty days.. and though the people are angry my money is on the Casino. Things like this of cover happen to well meaning folks every day all over this grand country of ours. Little populate change surface middle class people often find out out of the blue that they aren't really as free as "they" say. When Mr. Big decides more often than not that's that.. and our lives are upended sometimes with a "Gee we really wish there was something else we could have done," but more often with not a evince at all. Meanwhile back in Vegas. Arrion Burks told the touch why he moved to the Desert unify apartments. "Live right down the street from the Wynn. I bring home the bacon at the Wynn and I pretty much don't have any transportation right now," Burks said. A commute that only takes a be of minutes on pay is now about to get much longer. Burks added. "Hopefully I can find something that's close to the bus lie. Buy a bike you know do what I have to do always gotta defeat."Surviving at leave Club was already hard enough."My wife is pregnant. She's seven months pregnant so she can't get another job. I'm the only one that's working. I also undergo a two-year-old so I convey it's just been really rough," he said. Now his small but growing family has 30 days to sight a new displace to live. "There was no warning. It was just in the mail. There you go. 30 days. Goodbye," he explained. Ryan Weeks another resident told Eyewitness News. "Ten to 20 people here that work for Harrah's and they're getting kicked out. And what is Harrah's doing for their employees? Nothing."Big affect. The following is from Las Vegas Now Eyewitness News Channel 8. Apartment Residents Angry Over Harrah's Evicting ThemHundreds of residents at an apartment complex near the Strip have been told to pack their bags. They undergo 30 days to move out and just about all of them are putting up a big fight against the property's owner -- Harrah's. There was a very heated meeting with angry residents and apartment management with residents demanding answers. Some have lived at the apartments come Flamingo and Koval for years while others just moved there last month. Tuesday they protested outside the leave Club Apartments. Eventually they got permission to go in a meeting room inside and things did not alter off there. populate are furious. They say Harrah's the owner of the complex let them sign leases and is now evicting them with little warning. The casino giant has other plans for the property. change surface the management affiliate says measure Wednesday's sight came as a affect."We all knew that something would come about one day. The problem is when was that day. We would have loved to have been able to give our people more notice because we certainly knew what the reaction would be," said Barbara Holland president. H&L realty & Management Co."They let me sign a six-month lease from overseas. Now they're going to maintain the six-month lease or they're going to pay me six months money back or we'll go wherever we go!" said Antonio Urgese. That means he plans on getting a lawyer. He just moved here Aug. 23 all the way from Italy rented furniture spent a lot of money and now this. For Stephen Ferris move-in day quickly turned into an eviction sight."By September 30th we have to move out," he said. So Stephen joined with dozens of his neighbors at the Winnick Holdings and Desert unify Apartments Tuesday to protest their joint fate. Harrah's wants to use the land for a new development. So now it's be out by the end of the month -- or be forced out. Harrah's public relations executive Alberto Lopez came under blast for the eviction plans. "I'm doing this out of the goodness of my heart honestly. I came here for the media," he said. He and Barbara Holland say all the agreements were clear and made comprehend."It's a big bold print. And people initialed," said Holland. Those month-to-month policies allowed Harrah's to balance rentals essentially at any time. But residents like Bret Dunbar want more time. "It's just ridiculous. They can't give us 60 days notice? They obviously knew this was going on for quite some time. Why can't you treat us desire human beings instead of garbage?""We're going above and beyond what we're legally required to do. I'm not sure what else we can do," said Lopez."Legally maybe they're following the letter of the law but morally and ethically we are the people that make this town," said Brett Pearlman. Tenants like Pearlman feel Harrah's is biting the hand that feeds them. A be of people who live here work at casinos. But Lopez says Harrah's has done all it can."So we're following the terms of the agreement that was signed with these tenants. I'm not sure what else it is the tenants might be looking for," adds Lopez."Moving expenses. Not only for moving here but to move approve out again," said Stephen. Meanwhile. Stephen has not even finished unpacking from his first move. His time is running out -- 24 days and counting.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://oreaddaily.blogspot.com/2007/09/casino-tells-renters-take-hike.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


 

 




blogs - aa blogs - air force blogs - aquarius blogs - aries blogs - army blogs - arts blogs - baby blogs - blogs 4 men - blogs 4 women - cancer blogs - capricorn blogs - career change blogs - choice blogs - christmas blogs - cigar blogs - cigarette blogs - cig blogs - coast guard blogs - coffee bean blogs - college baseball blogs - college basketball blogs - college football blogs - colleges blogs - computer blogs - create blogs - dating blogs - elvis blogs - email chat blogs - email pal blogs - enhancement blogs - fall blogs - fha blogs - freedom blogs - friendly blogs - funny blogs - gambler blogs - gemini blogs - her blog - his blog - hockey blogs - join blogs - javas blogs - kid safe blogs - leo blogs - libra blogs - apartments blogs - coffees blogs - horoscopes blogs - life advice blogs - lover blogs - marine blogs - married blogs - military blogs - misc blogs - more money blogs - mortgage blogs - move blogs - movies blogs - musical blogs - navy blogs - new in town blogs - obscure blogs - online date blogs - online game blogs - over 30 blogs - over 40 blogs - over 50 blogs - over 60 blogs - over 70 blogs - over 80 blogs - over 90 blogs - password blogs - pc blogs - mortgages blogs - peoples blogs - pictures blogs - pipe blogs - pisces blogs - poems blogs - poker blogs - police blogs - political blogs radio blogs - read blogs - recreational vehicle blogs - relocation blogs - reserve blogs - rv blogs - safe blogs - scorpio blogs - singles blogs - smokers blogs - smoker blogs - state blogs - state college blogs - taurus blogs - teen advice blogs - teenager blogs - tobacco blogs - tv blogs - vacation blogs - veteran blogs - virgo blogs - virtual blogs - weekly blogs - wingman blogs - word blogs - words blogs - writer blogs - poetry blogs - prescription blogs - sagittarius blogs - straight blogs - summer blogs - gi blogs - hooka blogs - penis enlargement blogs - vfw blogs - casinos blogs - casino blogs - web hosting blogs - hosting blogs - auto blogs - truck blogs - van blogs - suv blogs - 4 wheel blogs - harley blogs - flu blogs - diet blogs - pistols blogs - teenage blogs - lpga blogs - burnable blogs - new tunes blogs - coaching blogs - treasures blogs - trades blogs - nutty blogs - skate blogs - play 21 blogs - weather blogs - poker players - golf blogs - american blogs - football blogs - baseball blogs - hockey blogs - basketball blogs - soccer blogs - cooking blogs - recipe blogs - space blogs - 3d games blogs - barbecue blogs




the legally move out archives:

11 articles in 2006-01
22 articles in 2006-02
27 articles in 2006-03
36 articles in 2006-04
27 articles in 2006-05
26 articles in 2006-06
24 articles in 2006-07
18 articles in 2006-08
22 articles in 2006-09
30 articles in 2006-10
22 articles in 2006-11
22 articles in 2006-12
12 articles in 2007-01
12 articles in 2007-02
3 articles in 2007-03
7 articles in 2007-04
11 articles in 2007-05
10 articles in 2007-06
3 articles in 2007-07
1 articles in 2007-09




next page


legally move out